Analyst: Rudy Alforque, 8/23/95
E-Mail: rudy@bnl.gov
The failure criterion specified in the B&PV Code is the Maximum Shear Stress Theory which is often called as the Tresca criterion. It states that failure of the material subject to multi-axial stress occurs when the maximum shearing stress at any point reaches the value of the shearing stress at failure in a simple tension or compression test on the same material. Accordingly, it can be formulated as Stress Intensity, Sint = max{abs|S1-S2|, abs|S2-S3|, abs|S1-S3|} = Yield Point, Sy, where S1, S2, S3 are the principal stresses.
The Code, however, stipulates that the calculated stress intensity should be within specified limiting values, instead of the material yield point, Sy, as indicated above. In our case, based on Table AD-150.1, & Fig. 4-130.1 of Appendix 4 of the B&PV Code VIII-2, in order to satisfy item 1 in the problem description above, with the design pressure of 275 psi, the calculated stress intensity at any point on the end volume should not exceed 1.5Sm. With the values of Sm shown under Parameters above, the limiting value to satisfy item 1 is:
On the other hand, Item 2 can be satisfied by showing that the calculated stress intensity at the given test pressure (316 psi) does not exceed 80% of the yield point, Sy, of the material. This stipulation is specified by AD-151, & AD-151.2 of the B&PV Code VIII-2. With the values of Sy shown under Parameters above, the limiting value to satisfy item 2 is:
Hence, a finite element model was developed using ANSYS5.1. In order to account for the effect of the three holes on the endplate due to the helium pipes and the beam tube, a 3-D shell model was developed using element type SHELL43. This element has six degrees of freedom at each node: translations, and rotations in the nodal x, y, and z axes.
The resulting stress intensities at critical locations were compared to the corresponding limiting values as described above. Please note that the pressure load that was applied to the model was rounded off to 320 psi.
Structural Analysis: RHIC D0 Magnet End Volume
-----------------------------------------------
M O D E L I N F O R M A T I O N:
----------------------------------
LIST ELEMENT TYPES FROM 1 TO 1 BY 1
ELEMENT TYPE 1 IS SHELL43 4-NODE STRUCTURAL SHELL INOPR
KEYOPT(1-12)= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CURRENT NODAL DOF SET IS UX UY UZ ROTX ROTY ROTZ
THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODEL
RELEVANT MATERIAL PROPERTIES:
-----------------------------
EX = 0.28400E+08
NUXY = 0.30000
GXY = 0.12500E+08
ALPX = 0.84507E-05
DENS = 0.29000
KXX = 0.78000
C = 0.12000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solid model summary:
Largest Number Number
Number Defined Selected
Keypoints . . . . . . . . . 58 58 58
Lines . . . . . . . . . . . 98 98 98
Areas . . . . . . . . . . . 40 40 40
Volumes . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
Finite element model summary:
Largest Number Number
Number Defined Selected
Nodes . . . . . . . . . . . 1839 1839 1839
Elements. . . . . . . . . . 1744 1744 1744
Element types . . . . . . . 1 1 n.a.
Real constant sets. . . . . 2 2 n.a.
Material property sets. . . 1 1 n.a.
B O U N D A R Y C O N D I T I O N I N F O R M A T I O N ------------------
Number
Defined
Constraints on nodes. . . . . . . . . . . 388
Constraints on keypoints. . . . . . . . . 0
Constraints on lines. . . . . . . . . . . 187
Constraints on areas. . . . . . . . . . . 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIST SOLID MODEL BOUNDARY CONDITIONS (LABEL = LSBC)
ON ALL SELECTED LINES
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINE SURFACE NORMAL AREA
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 SYMMETRY 1
56 SYMMETRY 21
57 SYMMETRY 10
58 SYMMETRY 9
59 SYMMETRY 29
60 SYMMETRY 30
61 SYMMETRY 31
62 SYMMETRY 32
63 SYMMETRY 20
82 SYMMETRY 33
84 SYMMETRY 33
86 SYMMETRY 34
88 SYMMETRY 35
90 SYMMETRY 36
92 SYMMETRY 37
94 SYMMETRY 38
96 SYMMETRY 39
97 SYMMETRY 40
98 SYMMETRY 40
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AREA PRESSURE SLKCN SLDIR SLZERO SLOPE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
2 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
3 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
4 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
5 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
6 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
7 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
8 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
9 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
10 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
11 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
12 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
13 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
14 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
15 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
16 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
17 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
18 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
19 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
20 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
21 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
22 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
23 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
24 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
25 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
26 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
27 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
28 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
29 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
30 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
31 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
32 320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
33 -320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
34 -320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
35 -320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
36 -320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
37 -320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
38 -320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
39 -320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
40 -320. 0 0 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The max. stress intensity on the shell as given above is the max. value of SI when only the outer shell elements are selected. The nodal averaging process only takes into account the nodes of the selected elements and ignores the contribution of the unselected end plate elements. Thus, the max. outer shell stress intensity would be a more conservative estimate of the potential stress around the welded interface between the shell and end plate.
The max. stress intensity on the endplate occurs at the center hole region. This is consistent with Roark and Youngs formula for a circular plate with simply supported outer edge, and free inner edge. From Table 4, Case 2, (Ref: Formulas for Stress and Strain, 5th Edition, by Roark and Young), @ P=320 psi, the max. stress would be 15,026 psi, and the max. displacement, Uz, is -0.0075 in. In our FEM model with the same load, the max. stress intensity on the end plate is 16, 686 psi, and the max. displacement, Uz, is -0.0069 in.